<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<feed version="0.3" xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#">
<title>Comments: CommentsTrack appears in public!?</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html"
 href="http://commentstrack.net/2004/08/25/commentstrack-appears-in-public/#comments"/>
<modified>2010-08-01T09:42:00Z</modified>
<author>
	<name>Jan</name>
</author>

<entry>
    <title>Comment #1, by Jan</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html"
     href="http://commentstrack.net/2004/08/25/commentstrack-appears-in-public/#comment-1"/>
     <summary type="text/html">test</summary>
    <id>http://commentstrack.net/2004/08/25/commentstrack-appears-in-public/#comment-1</id>
    <issued>2004-08-27T17:25:22Z</issued>
    <modified>2004-08-27T17:25:22Z</modified>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Comment #2, by Jan</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html"
     href="http://commentstrack.net/2004/08/25/commentstrack-appears-in-public/#comment-2"/>
     <summary type="text/html">There is one problem that isn't mentioned in the specs: security and spam. Basically, as a user of CommentsTrack, I don't want anyone to send me a ping, just because they found out my CommentsTrack url...<br />
There needs to be some kind of authentication between the comment server and my comment tracking server, that proves that I really wanted to track this discussion.<br />
<br />
Also, it's not clear in the wiki where feedback should be left. I didn't want to add a comment directly in the spec ;-)</summary>
    <id>http://commentstrack.net/2004/08/25/commentstrack-appears-in-public/#comment-2</id>
    <issued>2004-08-27T23:55:50Z</issued>
    <modified>2004-08-27T23:55:50Z</modified>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Comment #3, by Jan</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html"
     href="http://commentstrack.net/2004/08/25/commentstrack-appears-in-public/#comment-3"/>
     <summary type="text/html">v0.3 doesn't mention security and spam at all, but v0.4 surely will. We didn't consider it so important working on v0.3 because we had several other problems, and so we forgot.<br />
<br />
Yesterday evening I sat there and thought about TypeKey and SORUA, very useful ideas we also can learn from and use parts. In my head there's a nice way to avoid spam already :) But no time to bring it to paper so far.<br />
<br />
Until now we didn't release a spec for comments (RFC), that's the problem. We thought that we could finish v0.4 faster, but day-work needs time too. I'm gonna do an entry for v0.1 to v0.3 where comments for these drafts can be put.<br />
<br />
Edit: <a href="http://commentstrack.net/2004/08/28/specification-v01-v03/">http://commentstrack.net/2004/08/28/specification-v01-v03/</a><br />
Now there's a place to leave comment for v0.3, we surely don't want to miss yours.</summary>
    <id>http://commentstrack.net/2004/08/25/commentstrack-appears-in-public/#comment-3</id>
    <issued>2004-08-28T01:01:56Z</issued>
    <modified>2004-08-28T01:01:56Z</modified>
</entry>
</feed>

