<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">

<channel>
    <title>Comments: CommentsTrack appears in public!?</title>
    <link>http://commentstrack.net/2004/08/25/commentstrack-appears-in-public/#comments</link>
    <description>Feed of comments for CommentsTrack appears in public!?</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:46:49 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <generator>jpwswan (jan-piotrowski-weblog-system-without-a-name) 0.4</generator>
    <managingEditor>mail@janpiotrowski.de (Jan Piotrowski)</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>mail@janpiotrowski.de (Jan Piotrowski)</webMaster>

    <item>
        <title>Comment #1, by Jan</title>
        <link>http://commentstrack.net/2004/08/25/commentstrack-appears-in-public/#comment-1</link>
        <description><![CDATA[test]]></description>
        <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2004 17:25:22 GMT</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>test</dc:creator>
        <guid>http://commentstrack.net/2004/08/25/commentstrack-appears-in-public/#comment-1</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
        <title>Comment #2, by Jan</title>
        <link>http://commentstrack.net/2004/08/25/commentstrack-appears-in-public/#comment-2</link>
        <description><![CDATA[There is one problem that isn't mentioned in the specs: security and spam. Basically, as a user of CommentsTrack, I don't want anyone to send me a ping, just because they found out my CommentsTrack url...<br />
There needs to be some kind of authentication between the comment server and my comment tracking server, that proves that I really wanted to track this discussion.<br />
<br />
Also, it's not clear in the wiki where feedback should be left. I didn't want to add a comment directly in the spec ;-)]]></description>
        <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2004 23:55:50 GMT</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Julien Couvreur</dc:creator>
        <guid>http://commentstrack.net/2004/08/25/commentstrack-appears-in-public/#comment-2</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
        <title>Comment #3, by Jan</title>
        <link>http://commentstrack.net/2004/08/25/commentstrack-appears-in-public/#comment-3</link>
        <description><![CDATA[v0.3 doesn't mention security and spam at all, but v0.4 surely will. We didn't consider it so important working on v0.3 because we had several other problems, and so we forgot.<br />
<br />
Yesterday evening I sat there and thought about TypeKey and SORUA, very useful ideas we also can learn from and use parts. In my head there's a nice way to avoid spam already :) But no time to bring it to paper so far.<br />
<br />
Until now we didn't release a spec for comments (RFC), that's the problem. We thought that we could finish v0.4 faster, but day-work needs time too. I'm gonna do an entry for v0.1 to v0.3 where comments for these drafts can be put.<br />
<br />
Edit: <a href="http://commentstrack.net/2004/08/28/specification-v01-v03/">http://commentstrack.net/2004/08/28/specification-v01-v03/</a><br />
Now there's a place to leave comment for v0.3, we surely don't want to miss yours.]]></description>
        <pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2004 01:01:56 GMT</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
        <guid>http://commentstrack.net/2004/08/25/commentstrack-appears-in-public/#comment-3</guid>
    </item>

</channel>
</rss>

            